Tag Archives: activism

documentary, Film Screening

Tejiendo Sabiduria / We Women Warriors

2 Comments

 

Last Friday, I saw the premiere of We Women Warriors / Tejiendo Sabiduria at the IFC Center in the Village (NYC). This documentary, by Nicole Karsin, who was on hand for Q&A after the screening, followed three Colombian indigenous activists: Doris (Awá(, Ludis (Kankuamo), and Flor Ilva (Nasa). Their communities are caught between the military, FARC, and paramilitary forces and the attendant violence. Some of them have lost their husbands and are left as single parents, a situation they share with many women in their communities. While the killing of men has left many widows and fatherless children, women as well as children are also direct targets of violence. The film contains graphic content and shows how many people are so easily wrongly accused or framed. As female leaders, these three women are charged with making decisions on sensitive issues that affect their communities. They also work to find more sustainable working conditions. This includes a discussion about the irreconcilable positions of the protagonists of the war on drugs and (indigenous, in this case) farmers who have little alternatives to growing coca.

I often marvel at the footage that documentary filmmakers are able to capture given the risky circumstances they are filming. During the Q&A, I asked Karsin how she navigated the line between wanting to get these women’s (and people’s) stories to a greater audience, but also possibly putting them in danger as a result. Also, does having a film crew on hand help to temper a potentially violent situation? Karsin responded by noting that the Nasa themselves have better video equipment than she does and were on hand filming one of the events which I referred to (that could have taken a violent turn). Although I think that having a foreign filmmaker on hand at that particular event may have made a difference (although she did not, and with her experience, she would know better), the point is well taken that indigenous people are themselves protagonists in the documentation of these events. So, she was not putting them at greater risk than the community itself was taking in also filming. The time invested in documentaries also never ceases to impress me. In response to another moviegoer, Karsin noted that the film took 6 years to make, with varying degrees of time to gain the trust of the three women highlighted in the film, which has not yet been screened in Colombia.

This documentary would be useful for any class dealing with indigenous women in Latin America; the war on drugs and coca production; and the ongoing armed conflict in Colombia.

In signing off, I’d like to thank my cousin Yvonne who attended the film screening with me. I don’t think I gave her enough of an explanation about this film, so I think it was a rude awakening after having our quiet vegan dinner at Cafe Blossom a few blocks away! But she said she was glad to have attended because it’s good to see what’s going on out there in the rest of the world. Which would make a good slogan for a t-shirt for documentaries. And I couldn’t agree more. Until  next time…

 

documentary, Film Festivals

#NAFVF11 Opening Night

Thursday, March 31st was the opening night of the 2011 Native American Film and Video Festival at the National Museum of the American Indian in New York City. This was my third time at the Festival and while I have always enjoyed myself in the past, this year, the organizers took it up a notch. So, I’d like to congratulate everyone involved with putting the Festival together. First off, while the Native Networks website remains an invaluable resource, I love this year’s festival website. Second, it was pretty cool that on opening night, the film screened online and the Q&A included questions from around the world via Twitter (the Festival hashtag is #NAFVF11, which I’ve been using to tweet about the festival). Finally, the director of the opening night film, Qapirangajuq: Inuit Knowledge and Climate Change, Zacharias Kunuk, skyped in from the Arctic! Oh, and the Festival trailer was a nice touch, too. So, an all around great job of making use of technology to bring these films to the world and back.

And now, on to the show… The opening night film, Qapirangajuq, was directed by Zacharias Zunuk, who also directed the well known film Atanarjuaat/The Fast Runner. This documentary was a huge undertaking involving interviews with 60 elders from 4 communities who speak 5 different Innuit dialects and live in different parts of the Arctic. The elders discussed environmental concerns such as changing wind patterns which make it impossible to accurately predict the weather,* changes in the location of the setting of the sun, and the drastic melting of ice in the Arctic. The documentary presaged the festival’s focus on the environment (Friday, April 1 was largely devoted to films on the environment and ended with a panel discussion called “Protecting our Rivers”).

One of the highlights of the screening came during the Q&A, when an audience member asked co-director Ian Mauro about the correlation which the film made between the positioning of celestial bodies and the environmental crisis. Mauro, who has a doctorate in Environmental Studies, gave a great explanation, but in my effort to jot it down, I only caught interesting pieces. Elders from all over were commenting about the shift in the earth’s axis but Mauro could find nothing about it in the scholarly literature. However, scientists did stand up and take notice when Mauro described a process that is known to them as “refraction.” Due to the collision of hot and cold air in the Arctic, the sun creates an optical illusion which makes it appear at times of the year when it would not normally appear. Mauro noted that this oscillation process is the same that can sort of help you tell the future: if a walrus is oscillating in the horizon, it is a few hours away. Qapirangajuq is the Inuktitut word that comes closest to the English word “refraction” (I believe Mauro translated the word into English as “a pencil that looks bent in the water”). Hearing all this was a highlight to me because it was an instance of native people observing what scientists had not. (In that Russell Means video I referenced earlier, he also noted that scientists still had not come to understand that hair carries memory.)

One of the eloquent voices in the film was Innuit leader named Mary Simon. One of her simple yet powerful statements was that many who debate the environmental crisis focus on national boundaries, which is misguided because the environmental crisis affects us all, regardless of boundaries. Finding cross-cultural common ground in order to help solve the environmental crisis was a theme during the conference and highlighted in movies like River of Renewal. While refraction was a complicated idea to relay, it was surprisingly simple, yet disturbing, to understand how toxins, like yellow acid rain, precipitate, travel north to the Arctic and get locked there. In the film, interviewees noted that people in the Arctic are especially vulnerable since they will be the first to be affected from fish who have high levels of mercury. It was really striking to see our interconnectedness.

Besides showing us the importance of our interconnected actions vis-a-vis the environment, the film is more pointedly critical of Westerners’ roles in Innuit communities. Mauro chuckles while he acknowledges that his Inuktitut nickname is “the thief,” a name he says serves as a reminder of his position in the Innuit culture, where researchers are often seen as more interested in their research than in the local culture. One interviewee prompted laughter as he wonders where all the scientists who claim that the polar bears are in danger of decline are, since he sees no evidence of their disappearing. Another argues that it is actually outsiders, with their noisy helicopters and the collars that are placed on the bears, who are really harming these animals.

This is one of those movies that everyone should watch but in terms of scholarly interest, those teaching about the environment and Innuit culture will want to check this documentary out. In addition, I would recommend it as a way to sensitize science students and scholars doing scientific work in native or other communities to the concerns of the communities where they are studying or working and, ultimately, the big one we’re all inhabiting: the earth.
* This reminded me of a video I recently watched where Russell Means laments the fact that historically, the Lakota had 52 different words for cloud formations. Can you imagine? Not only that there were 52, but that so many could have been lost.

animation, documentary, feature film, Film Festivals

AAIA 6th Annual Short Film Showcase

A trailer for the documentary “LaDonna Harris: Indian 101” produced by Julianna Brannum

Last night, I caught the Association on American Indian Affairs Film Showcase at NYU’S Cantor Center where Firelight Media co-founder and CCNY alumnus, Stanley Nelson was honored. He directed Wounded Knee, episode 5 of  the PBS  We Shall Remain series, which I have not had a chance to see yet. After the trailer they showed last night, I can’t wait to check it out.

Shorts in the festival included “Macnpc,” directed by Tvli Jacobs (Choctaw), a one minute parody about native versus Anglo ways and a music video called “Steve’s Special” by Sonya Oberly (Nez Perce) that took place on the Tohono O’odham reservation. Young filmmakers were a big presence last night. Nuweetooun School students created an animation called “How Birds Got Their Song,” which adapts a traditional Narragansett story and which I thought was very pretty both visually and aurally. The Tesuque Pueblo Youth Film Group, Marcella Ernest, and Rachael Nez directed “Bonanza Creek,” a funny non-scripted film about Mohawk and Pueblo ancestors. And, 8th grader Camille Manybeads Tso (Dine-Navajo) directed “In the Footsteps of Yellow Woman,” a documentary/feature about her great great great grandmother and her courage during the Navajo Long Walk (1864-1868). The young people in this film did a very nice acting job.

I enjoyed the whole festival but the three films which were most arresting for me are the ones I only saw clips of. I already mentioned “Wounded Knee.” The second was the documentary “LaDonna Harris: INDIAN 101″ about the Comanche activist who has played a pivotal role in Native self determination and has started an Ambassadors program to teach and train future Native American leaders. A clip of that film heads this post. The third is Billy Luther’s “Grab,” a documentary about the Laguna Pueblo’s “Grab Day” celebration, where the tribe shares food and other things with their community. I smiled watching one of the trailer’s phrases shoot past:”Indian giver redefined.” I’m on Facebook with Billy and didn’t even know about his film, “Miss Navajo,” so as you can see, I have a lot of watching to catch up with! Will post here when I do. Thanks to Amalia Córdova of the NMAI Video and Film Center for letting me know about this festival and to Raquel Chapa for putting the line up together!

‘Til next time…

documentary, Film Screening, Q&A

Crude: The Real Price of Oil

1 Comment

English below.

Español pronto…

Last Wednesday afternoon, after a circuitous ride into Flushing Meadows Park, I eventually made my way to the parking lot of the Queens Museum of Art. (This brought to mind a similarly circuitous excursion over 10 years ago when a colleague and I went to Flushing Meadows Park to have cuy for dinner. Lucky for the ‘immortal cuy’ – about which Cuencanos ponder at length when the mood strikes us – we never did find the vendor.) Since I was an hour early, I was hoping there was a café where I could have dinner before the show. But, it looks like I’m destined to go without food whenever I travel to this park since the lady at the information desk told me that the Museum (and any potential café therein) was closed. My stomach usually waits for no one but it did on Wednesday because, GPS and all, I would have taken too long to find my way out and toward food. After a longer wait than I anticipated – since the movie started ET (no, not Eastern Time; Ecuadorian Time, half past the scheduled hour) – the screening began.

The award-winning film Crude: The Real Price of Oil explores the legal battle being waged against Texaco/Chevron (Texaco merged with Chevron in 2001) for its environmental pollution of the Ecuadorian Amazon and the attendant havoc it is wreaking on Ecuadorian communities, both mestizo and indigenous. Humans and animals are dying as a result of this huge oil spill, which exceeds the Exxon Valdez spill by millions of gallons. Thirty thousand Ecuadorians have brought a claim against Texaco/Chevron. The company, however, claims to have systematically cleaned up the spills before leaving Ecuador in the mid 1990s, when the government-run PetroEcuador took over the operation. The case is still pending; indeed, community’s lawyers note that the company is using a delay tactic in order to bankrupt their case. Detractors say the plaintiffs’ lawyers, which includes an American team funded by a U.S. firm (who is not doing the work pro bono) and an Ecuadorian lawyer named Pablo Fajardo, who was featured in Vanity Fair’s Green Issue and received a CNN Heroes Award, are doing the work for monetary benefit.

Fajardo is an interesting person who I found to be the most passionate and convincing voice in this film. A mother whose child is suffering from cancer was its most heartbreaking. Another interesting personality was the humorous and frank American lawyer Steven Dozinger. His Ecuadorianisms as well as an interesting cultural exchange between him and members of the Ecuadorian team elicited chuckles from the audience. I am glad that Berlinger included his exchange with the Ecuadorian team because I think we often tend to privilege American ways of doing and knowing.

After the screening, the directer, Joe Berlinger; producer, Michael Bonfiglio, and the editor, Alyse Ardell Spiegel, were on hand for questions. Bonfiglio and Carlos Guttierez, co-founder of Cinema Tropical (one of the movie hosts, along with the Queens Museum of Art, the Consulate General of Ecuador and the National Museum of the American Indian), provided English to Spanish translation (the movie screened in Spanish). Berlinger noted that he was motivated to make the film when he saw that, instead of eating fresh fish caught in uncontaminated waters, people in the Ecuadorian Amazon were eating tuna fish out of a can which was packed who knows how many miles away. He felt he could not live his suburban lifestyle knowing that people were living in these conditions and felt a broader indignation about how, in his words, white people have abused Indians over 500 years. This was an interesting statement to hear in this setting since I haven’t always experienced feelings of solidarity on the part of the general Ecuadorian population toward the indigenous population. (I am certain Ecuadorians have felt the effects of the North/South divide but not necessarily as it pertains to Indians.) A few audience members noted that they had never even heard of this situation and were both very appreciative that Berlinger took the time and work to make this film and were interested in ensuring that more people saw it. Berlinger noted that one way to ensure it continues to be seen is for it to have a good run at the IFC Center in New York City where it will be playing, with English subtitles, September 9-22. I thought one audience member was particularly conscientious in noting that the film should also be translated into Chinese since the Chinese are currently buying a lot of petroleum in Ecuador and should be made aware of how their dealings in Ecuador impact the people there.

I am curious to know about the role of the Ecuadorian government. Berlinger noted that the Correa government has been environmentally progressive. Although the government does not have the resources to clean it all, they have cleaned up some of the damage. Moreover, in a fascinating turn, Ecuador has given constitutional rights to flora and fauna! However, I was angered to hear that the Ecuadorian government (not during Correa’s presidency) released Texaco/Chevron of any legal responsibility upon leaving Ecuador in the 1990s. (It should be noted that while the government released them, the Ecuadorians affected did not; that is how they are able to take the company to court.) Texaco/Chevron claims that PetroEcuador has caused several spills after Texaco/Chevron left the country and that they should be held accountable. I do not mean to diminish Texaco/Chevron’s role in this mess; the company should be held accountable for the damage they have caused. I am wondering whether or not the government conducted a thorough investigation to ensure that the transnational actually cleaned up before they signed this release. Did they know the extent of the damage before the community began to feel its effects? Have governments ever been held accountable for any potential neglect in similar cases?

I wish these questions had been addressed in some way (and just so you know, I finally did raise my hand but there were too many people ahead of me with their own questions). I also thought the film would have been more effective if some testimony wasn’t left out. For example, someone asked whether there were ex-company employees who had witnessed the company’s wrongdoing. Berlinger decided, for reasons of length, to use only the views articulated in the trial.

Still, the film, which was filmed on different continents and over years, was very good and definitely very engaging. In addition to timely coverage of a lamentable situation that is ultimately caused by worldwide addiction to oil and therefore touches us all, it used candid moments to focus the lens on various aspects of the case. Although certain personalities definitely stand out in the movie, I just noticed that Berlinger didn’t want to privilege any one voice. From the Amazonian indigenous woman who sings about the population’s plight in the beginning of this documentary through environmental philanthropist Sting singing “I’ll send an S.O.S. to the world” at the end, many voices have their say. Speaking of music, I thought it was cool that Berlinger used music that was representative of Ecuador’s various ethnicities; I heard indigenous music from the sierra as well as the Amazon; Afro-Ecuadorian music and the old standby, Julio Jaramillo.

So, please let someone know about the movie and about the situation. Visit the website and peep the trailer below.

Film Screening, Q&A

“Crude”: éste miercoles, 26 de agosto

Leave a comment

Recibí ésta invitación y quise hacerles llegar. El documental se dará solamente en español y por ende no traduzco al inglés.

EL CONSULADO GENERAL DE ECUADOR EN NUEVA YORK y el MUSEO DE ARTE DE QUEENS en colaboración con el MUSEO NACIONAL DEL INDÍGENA AMERICANO y CINEMA TROPICALtienen el agrado de invitarlo a una función especialde pre-estreno de la película

Crude: The Real Price of Oil

Dirigida por Joe Berlinger, Ecuador/USA, 2009, 105 min.

En inglés, español, a’ ingae y secoya con subtítulos en español.

LA ÉPICA HISTORIA DEL INFAME CASO TEXACO, UNO DE LOS

CASOS JURÍDICOS MÁS GRANDES Y MÁS CONTROVERTIDOS DEL MUNDO.

Encabezados por el abogado Pablo Fajardo, quien se ha convertido ya en todo un héroe popular en el Ecuador, el caso legal ha puesto a 30 mil indígenas en contra del gigante petrolero estadounidense.

MIÉRCOLES, 26 DE AGOSTO, 7PM

MUSEO DE ARTE DE QUEENS

NYC Building, Flushing Meadows Corona Park, Queens

¡Con la presencia de invitados especiales!

Entrada libre. Reserve a gabriel@queensmuseum.org

ó al teléfono (718) 592-9700 ext. 140

www.crudethemovie.com

Upcoming Film

Contrary Warrior

Leave a comment

Just read about an upcoming documentary called Contrary Warrior about Adam Fortunate Eagle, who organized the takeover of Alcatraz in 1969. He has written several books, including Heart of the Rock: The Indian Invasion of Alcatraz (with Tom Findley). For those of you interested in the occupation (legitimated by the Sioux Treaty of 1868, also known as the Treaty of Fort Laramie, which stipulated that surplus federal property could be awarded to the Sioux), I thought I’d mention that John Garvey’s book review mentions the seminal (but often overlooked) role that a native woman named Belva Cottier had on the first occupation of Alcatraz in 1964.

It’s interesting that even though Fortunate Eagle organized the second occupation, I was unable to find an encyclopedia entry on him on one of my library’s online encyclopedias. This was the case even when I used his former name, Adam Norwall. I’m going to see if there are any print reference books that have an entry on him.

Fortunate Eagle’s activist work is noted for its poignancy through humor and he has been called a great storyteller so it looks like the documentary would be interesting to check out. Thanks to Kendra Kennedy on H-AMINDIAN for posting the article about the documentary!

References

Mullen, Frank X. Jr. “Fallon Artist and Native Activist in New Film.” San Jose Mercury News June 27, 2009.

Garvey, J.  “Heart of the Rock: The Indian Invasion of Alcatraz.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 27, no. 1 (2003): 148-50.

“Heart of the Rock: The Indian Invasion of Alcatraz.” Publishers Weekly 249, no. 9 (March 4, 2002): 71.